Legal Opinion
Lady v. Thomas
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 1, 1940No. Civ. No. 6340PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from that portion of a judgment of foreclosure which denied him relief against an undisclosed principal in the execution of the promissory note which was secured by a trust deed. An effort is also made to appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
*689The statute does not authorize an appeal from an order denying a motion for new trial. The attempt to appeal from that order was therefore ineffectual. (Strauch v. Bieloh, 16 Cal. App. (2d) 278 [60 Pac. (2d) 582].)
The complaint alleges, and the court found, that the defendants Mr. and Mrs. James H.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Craig v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Strauch v. BielohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Crocker Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. SayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. CryerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pratt v. HopperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- Opelika Production Credit Ass'n, Inc. v. LambSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Columbia Finance Corporation v. RobitcheckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Wenzel MacHinery Rental & Sales Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Schwaegler Co. v. MarchesottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Plains State Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.