Legal Opinion

Opelika Production Credit Ass'n, Inc. v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 28, 1978No. 77-229PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Samuel R. Lamb filed suit against Reckie R. Barela seeking possession of 68 cows, 2 angus bulls, the increase thereof, and damages for the conversion of these animals. Opelika Production Credit Association (Opelika Credit) intervened in the action claiming all of the cattle in Barela's care under a security agreement executed by Barela. The intervenor also claimed $74,582.28 due by open account from Lamb and Barela, jointly and severally, as well as money owed them by Barela separately on two promissory notes. All parties to the action agreed to sell all of the cattle in Barela's possession…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beloit Corp. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Olwell v. Nye & Nissen Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Edwards v. Lee's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Lady v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Schwaegler Co. v. MarchesottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  2. Utah Foam Products, Inc. v. Polytec, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Midland Diesel Service & Engine Co. v. SivertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Fed. Land Bank of New Orleans v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  5. Estes v. MonkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API