Lindemuth v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Gernon, J.:
Kent D. Lindemuth appeals from a district court ruling which granted summary judgment to his former employer, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Goodyear). The district court held that Lindemuth failed to allege sufficient facts to support the tort of outrage and that other incidents complained of by Lindemuth were not defamatory as a matter of law. The district court also held that the majority of Lindemuth’s claims involving his discharge from Goodyear were preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1988).
The issues we must resolve on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of TopekaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Sawyer v. Southwest Airlines Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Dominguez v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
- Greenfield v. Schmidt Baking Co., Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Ali v. Douglas Cable CommunicationsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.