Legal Opinion
Breen v. Peters
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2008No. Civil Action 05-654 (RWR)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this putative class action against a federal employer brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 633a, have moved to join twenty individuals as plaintiffs. In the alternative, the twenty individuals have moved to intervene. In addition, one plaintiff who was dismissed at his own request, Steven C. Syzmanski, has moved to be reinstated. Defendants oppose all three motions. Because the twenty individuals defaulted on a statutory deadline and have not shown cause to excuse the default,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- William L. Mondy v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Hobart N. Crocker, Jr. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., Hobart N. Crocker, Jr. v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. CastroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Chennareddy v. DodaroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Halldorson v. Sandi GroupDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Breen v. MinetaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Breen v. MinetaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.