Legal Opinion

Fund for Animals v. Mainella

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided September 26, 2003No. CIV.A. 02-11855-PBSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SARIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs 1 challenge hunting on the Cape Cod National Seashore (the “Seashore”) on the ground that the National Park Service (“NPS”) has failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., and the implementing regulations, 40 C.F.R. § 1500.1 et seq. Plaintiffs also assert that NPS’s pheasant hunt program, 2 which releases non-native species into the Seashore ecosystem, violates NEPA as well as NPS’s own General Management Policies.

After hearing, the Court ALLOWS Plaintiffs’ motion for…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Humane Soc. of US v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  2. Sierra Club v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Sierra Club v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Fund for Animals v. MainellaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  5. United States v. Commonwealth of Mass.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API