Legal Opinion

Sierra Club v. Jewell

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 29, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-0479PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment; Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment; and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Intervenor-DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY Judgment

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United . States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

The American West is rich with wildlife of considerable ecological value. These related cases involve two iconic species — the elk and the grizzly bear — and their habitat in the Grand Teton National Park (“the Park”) in northwestern Wyoming. When Congress created…

2Cases cited82 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Hoopa Valley Tribe v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  3. Yurok Tribe v. United States Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  4. W. Watersheds Project v. TidwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. Sierra Club v. DOICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API