Legal Opinion

Humane Soc. of US v. Johanns

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 28, 2007No. Civil Action 06-265 (CKK)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Two claims remain in the instant action, found in Claim I and Claim III of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. In Claim III, Plaintiffs allege that, “by creating a fee-for-service ante-mortem horse slaughter inspection system without first conducting any environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act [(NEPA)], 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq., [United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)] has violated NEPA and the [Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ’s)] implementing regulations, abused its discretion, and acted arbitrarily…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army CorpsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  2. Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. WildEarth Guardians v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  4. Reed v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Odland v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API