Humane Soc. of US v. Johanns
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Two claims remain in the instant action, found in Claim I and Claim III of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. In Claim III, Plaintiffs allege that, “by creating a fee-for-service ante-mortem horse slaughter inspection system without first conducting any environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act [(NEPA)], 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq., [United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)] has violated NEPA and the [Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ’s)] implementing regulations, abused its discretion, and acted arbitrarily…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army CorpsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- WildEarth Guardians v. ZinkeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Reed v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Odland v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.