Legal Opinion

Merrill Bean Chevrolet, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1976No. 14263PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Here for review is a decision of the State Tax Commission sustaining a deficiency assessment for sales tax not paid on automobiles used, by plaintiff, in the demonstration of its stock in trade for the promotion of sales. We reverse.

Plaintiff is a franchised Chevrolet dealer. It is in the business of selling automobiles.

Its procedures for bookkeeping are established by General Motors, and all cars received by plaintiff are entered in the new-car inventory account. Upon determination by plaintiff that a vehicle is to be used as a demonstrator, such vehicle is transferred to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson Construction Company v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Union Portland Cement Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Robert H. Hinckley, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Barrett Investment Co. v. State Tax Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nucor Corp., Nucor Steel—Utah Division v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sanders Brine Shrimp v. Audit Division of Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Dorsey v. Department of Workforce Services, Workforce Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. Fussell v. Department of Commerce, Division of Occupational & Professional LicensingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  5. Hardy v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API