Legal Opinion

Robert H. Hinckley, Inc. v. State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1965No. 10260PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

Robert H. Hinckley, Inc., the plaintiff herein seeks review of a decision of the State Tax Commission sustaining assessments of sales and use tax deficiencies with penalties and interest thereon. We shall hereinafter refer to plaintiff as Hinckley.

Hinckley is a dealer in motor vehicles but for a number of years has also op*73■erated a business under the name of “Kwik Kafe,” retailing hot and cold drinks, candy and other foods through coin operated vending machines. These machines operate upon fixed multiples of' five cents and do not make change. Only one item can- be vended at one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Piedmont Canteen Service, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. White v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Utah Hotel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Calvert v. Canteen CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ralph Child Construction Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Trade Commission v. Skaggs Drug Centers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ames Volkswagen, Ltd. v. State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Newspaper Agency Corp. v. Auditing Division of Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Sanders Brine Shrimp v. Audit Division of Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. State, Department of Revenue & TaxationIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API