Legal Opinion

Barrett Investment Co. v. State Tax Commission of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1964No. 9872PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

Barrett Investment Company seeks review of a decision and order of the defendant, State Tax Commission of Utah, imposing a deficiency use tax assessment on out of state purchases of parts of machinery and equipment which became component parts of a ski lift erected near Brighton, Utah, and upon which parts no sales or use tax has been paid.

It is plaintiff’s contention that the parts of machinery and equipment purchased out of the state which were used to manufacture or assemble the ski lift are exempt from the use tax under the provisions of Sec. 59 — 16—4(d) and (h),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bailey v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Union Portland Cement Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Nucor Corp., Nucor Steel—Utah Division v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. BJ-Titan Services v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Merrill Bean Chevrolet, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API