Legal Opinion

Olson Construction Company v. State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1961No. 9362PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLISTER, Justice.

This is a proceeding to review a decision of The State Tax Commission of Utah denying plaintiffs’ claim for refund of sales tax. The facts were submitted by stipulation and are not in dispute.

Thiokol Chemical Corporation holds a prime contract with the United States Government for the construction of certain facilities near Brigham City, Utah. It awarded two subcontracts to Olson Construction Company, whereunder the latter agreed to construct certain buildings and other items for the project. Each of these subcontracts were to be performed for a lump sum price. In the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Utah Hotel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Utah Concrete Products Corp. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Steiner Construction Co. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Austin Liquor Mart, Inc. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Fusco-Amatruda Co. v. Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Atlas General IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API