Legal Opinion

United States v. Spradley

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 26, 1995No. NMCM 93 00216PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Chief Judge:

What is the effect of vacating a suspended court-martial sentence that was suspended after the accused had been administratively separated from active duty? We hold that the suspended portions of the appellant’s sentence were automatically extinguished or remitted by virtue of his earlier separation and concomitant termination of status as a person subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice [UCMJ]. Therefore, the general court-martial convening authority’s act of vacating the suspension was null and void because there was no longer any suspended sentence in existence.

I

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. SpellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. Wickham v. HallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. ColeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. KruseNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  2. United States v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  3. Murphy v. DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. ReidArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  5. United States v. Sergeant STEVEN E. WOLPERTArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API