Legal Opinion

United States v. Reid

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 26, 1996No. ARMY 9401123PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAIRNS, Senior Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial found the appellant guilty in accordance with his pleas of fraudulent separation, desertion, false official statement, possession and distribution of marijuana, larceny, and assault consummated by a battery in violation of Articles 83, 85, 107, 112a, 121, and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 883, 885, 907, 912a, 921, and 928 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. In accordance with a pretrial agreement and his pleas, appellant was found not guilty of larceny of government property, aggravated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. OhrtUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. HornerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. Wickham v. HallUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. Vanderbush v. SmithArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  3. Vanderbush v. SmithArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API