Legal Opinion
Wickham v. Hall
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided December 14, 1981No. 81-26PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COOK, Judge:
Petitioner seeks to prohibit her trial by special court-martial on a charge that she fraudulently procured her separation from the Army, in violation of Article 83(2), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 883(2). She alleges she was released from active duty for reason of pregnancy, and was duly issued a DD Form 214, titled Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The Government asserts petitioner’s representations of pregnancy were fraudulent; that the separation order directing her release has been revoked; and that she is amenable to trial by…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. HowardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- Smith v. VanderbushCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- Willenbring v. NeurauterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.