Legal Opinion
Beals v. Breeden Bros., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 24, 1992No. 16-89-05258; CA A67695, A69865PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Plaintiffs appeal two judgments that are consolidated in this appeal.1 The trial court ruled that plaintiffs’ complaints failed to state claims for relief and that the actions had not been commenced timely. ORCP 21A(8); ORCP 21A(9). We affirm.
In June, 1989, plaintiffs filed this action, alleging claims for negligence, breach of contract, fraud and violation of the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act (UTPA), ORS 646.605 to ORS 646.656, relating to structural damage to their homes allegedly caused by deposits of expansive clay located beneath the surface of the land. Plaintiffs are current or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Josephs v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Johnson v. Star MacHinery CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Eldridge v. Eastmoreland General HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Smith v. ABELOregon Supreme Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- PIH Beaverton, LLC v. Super One, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Cereghino v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1993
- Irvin Petersen Trucking, LLC v. ScalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025