Gaul v. General Utilities Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtpeld, J.,
This was an action in trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of a fall on a greasy sidewalk where fuel oil had been placed and permitted to remain.
Plaintiff’s statement of claim averred, inter alia, that the defendant through its agents or employees, “negligently and carelessly permitted a large quantity of fuel oil to come upon the sidewalk adjacent to the aforesaid premises and allowed the said fuel oil to remain upon said sidewalk, so that travel thereon by the general public, and more particularly by the plaintiff was made dangerous…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hostetler v. KniseleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Wright v. StraessleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Reardon v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Gorman v. Simon Brahm's Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Maerkle v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stottlemyer v. GrohCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- McCann v. Philadelphia Fairfax Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Actman v. ZubrowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Connelly v. Dependable Sanitation, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2022
- Kreps v. Dependable Sanitation, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2022