Legal Opinion

Maerkle v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1933No. Appeal, 99PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County denying plaintiff’s motion to strike off a compulsory nonsuit in favor of defendant. About nine p. m. on August 8, 1921, plaintiff was driving an automobile in a westerly direction along East Ohio Street in Pittsburgh. Defendant maintained on that street a double line of tracks for the operation of its street cars. At the above time and place defendant was operating a work car and trailer on these tracks in an easterly direction; the traffic at that place was heavy and automobiles…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shafer v. Lacock, Hawthorn & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Mars v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Janock v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Campbell v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Livingstone v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wright v. StraessleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Vescio v. Pennsylvania Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Kelly Et Ux. v. YountSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Schell v. Miller North Broad Storage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Schulz v. Reading Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API