Legal Opinion
City of Chino v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 2002No. E028198PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.
On July 30, 1998, the trial court, sitting as a municipal court, entered a judgment thát was appealed to the appellate division. On October 20, 2000, the appellate division rendered an opinion after rehearing which it certified for publication. On November 2, 2000, we ordered the case transferred to this court pursuant to California Rules of Court (Rules), rules 62(a) and (b). Subsequently, all issues except one were settled between the parties. We now consider the sole remaining issue.
The Underlying Case
Jackson Land Company (Jackson), a developer, built a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- In Re Estate of FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- DiGiacinto v. Ameriko-Omserv Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Foundation Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
3Cited by11 opinions
- Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Amwest Surety Insurance v. Patriot Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. DiSandroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- First National Insurance v. Cam Painting, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- City of Watsonville v. CorriganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.