Legal Opinion

First National Insurance v. Cam Painting, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 2009No. B200830PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

Appellant Cam Painting, Inc., was the contractor on a construction project for the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the Noble project. Cam hired a subcontractor, Sabco Electrique, Inc. Under the Cam-Sabco contract, Sabco was required to provide a payment and performance bond, with Cam as obligee. Sabco obtained its bond from respondent First National Insurance Company, which, coincidentally, had also issued a bond to Cam on the Noble project, with the LAUSD as obligee. In connection with the issuance of the bonds, both Cam and Sabco signed indemnity agreements…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Boys Club of San Fernando Valley, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Matthews v. HintonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Pacific Employers Insurance v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Boliver v. Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Antar v. Lexington National Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  2. Great American Insurance Company v. The Weitz Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. Great American Insurance Company v. The Weitz Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
  4. Payne v. American Contractors Indemnity Co. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API