Legal Opinion

City of Watsonville v. Corrigan

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 2007No. H030054PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

This appeal arises out of a cross-action by the City of Watsonville (City) against respondents Patrick T. and Jill Corrigan and Michael Tansy, who were partners in developing and marketing residential properties in Watsonville. The trial court ruled that respondents had no duty to reimburse the City for the costs and fees it had incurred in defending the underlying action, because the City had failed to tender its defense to respondents. On appeal, the City contends that tender was not a prerequisite for reimbursement under the parties’ indemnity agreement, under statutory and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
  2. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Gribaldo, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A. G.California Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Goldman v. Ecco-Phoenix Electric Corp.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Heppler v. J.M. Peters Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crawford v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API