Legal Opinion

American Motorists Insurance v. Travelers Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harold J. Hughes, J.

The motion of plaintiff Pizza Hut of America, Inc., and the cross motions of defendants Sandra Torre and Michael Wolfe for summary judgment declaring that Travelers Insurance policy number 914085227-101-1 provides liability coverage to Pizza Hut of America, Inc., Jacob Myers and Keith Myers upon the claims of Michael Wolfe and Sandra Torre, as administratrix of the estate of Charles J. Torre, and declaring that the disclaimer of coverage issued by Travelers Insurance Company is void, will be granted. The motion of Travelers Insurance Company for summary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  2. Allor v. DubayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Pizza Hut of America, Inc. v. West General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Dhillon v. General Accident Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Stanley v. American Motorist InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Insurance v. West American InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2000
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. ByfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lightning Rod Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lightning Rod Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API