Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1997No. 1996-2516Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. LIGHTNING ROD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE. [Cite as United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lightning Rod Mut. Ins. Co. (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 584.] Insurance — Automobile liability — Construction of policy — Exclusion of liability phrase “for a fee” ambiguous — Construed strictly against insurer and liberally in favor of insured. (No. 96-2516 — Submitted September 24, 1997 — Decided December 31, 1997.) CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Washington County, Nos. 95 CA 27 and 95 CA 29. The facts of this case are not in dispute. Ina M.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lane v. Grange Mutual CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. American Financial Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. RPM Pizza, Inc. v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API