Legal Opinion

Foster v. Coffey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 6, 1922No. 10,040PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to cancel deed; for partition of land, and division of personalty. Judgment for plaintiff. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of Adams County, Hon. Samuel W. Johnson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller

*172Defendant in error was plaintiff in a suit to cancel a deed given by Louise Coffey, his wife, one of the plaintiffs in error; for a partition of the land conveyed by said deed; and for a division of certain personal property alleged to be owned by plaintiff and his wife in common.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner, and in possession, of an undivided one-half interest in certain described lands and water rights, the other half interest being in defendant Louise Coffey, which lands she has attempted to convey to her children by a former marriage, reserving to herself a life…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Byers v. Denver Circle R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fairview Mining Corp. v. American Mines & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Morris v. HarropSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Boyd v. McElroySupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  4. Kitt v. RungeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  5. Bailey v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API