Legal Opinion

Boyd v. McElroy

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 13, 1940No. 14,371PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

Defendant in error McElroy brought suit, for specific performance of a lease containing an option to purchase, against plaintiff in error Viola R. Boyd and her husband John A. Boyd. The husband answered admitting the allegations of the amended complaint. Plaintiff in error filed a separate answer and a cross complaint. Both the husband and McElroy answered the cross complaint. McElroy had judgment, and Mrs. Boyd seeks reversal on a writ of error.

The instrument, Exhibit A, of which specific performance was granted, is in words and figures as follows:

“June 24, 1933.
“To Whom it May Concern.
“I,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horn v. HurwitzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  2. Foster v. CoffeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  3. Simpson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Boyd v. BoydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shull v. SextonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  2. Application of City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Thurmon v. SkiptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. D. A. C. Uranium Co. v. BentonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1956
  5. Brammer v. EllisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API