Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 5, 1924No. 10,613PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

This is an action in replevin. There was a judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings the case here.

The property involved is an' automobile. The amended complaint alleges that “before the commencement of this action, plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the immediate possession” of the automobile. The answer shows *347that the defendant, as ex officio sheriff of the City and County of Denver, had levied an execution on the machine as the property of one B. S. Cohen against whom judgments had been obtained by certain parties. The replication alleges, in substance, that at the time of the levy the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. CoffeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Messenger v. NorthcuttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Lampman v. LampingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Hoy v. LeonardColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stokes v. KirkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API