Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Bremer
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 7, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
These four actions of tort, by the same plaintiff against two different defendants, were tried together. In two of the cases the plaintiff seeks to recover for conscious suffering and death of her intestate; in the other two cases she seeks to recover for personal property damage.
The bill of exceptions shows that the declarations in the property damage cases were filed in court on January 5, 1925, and answers thereto on January 5 and January 21,
1925, respectively; that in the death actions substitute declarations were filed and allowed on October 28 and 26,
1926, respectively; that the answer…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Wellington v. Downer Kerosene Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Reardon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Mitchell v. LonerganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Becker v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Goldman v. Noxon Chemical Products Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.