Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Noxon Chemical Products Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 24, 1931PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This action of contract was begun on October 30, 1929. It was brought to recover commissions earned by the plaintiff as selling agent for the defendant. It resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for $1,340.70. It was tried with a cross action, begun on February 17, 1930, by the defendant against the plaintiff and one Lillian Goldman in which separate verdicts were rendered against each defendant therein for $13,753.28. This, cross action was brought to recover for money received by said selling agent and his wife from the sale of goods of the corporation and not accounted for. The verdicts…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McNaryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Delval v. GagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Rogers v. MurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Greene v. HatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Lewis v. Club Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Piper v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Gill v. Richmond Co-operative Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Forastiere v. Springfield Institution For SavingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.