Legal Opinion

Becker v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 27, 1932PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtField, J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensa- . tian for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff on March 22, 1929, alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence. The writ is dated December 9, 1929. The answer is a general denial and contributory negligence.

The defendant moved for a directed verdict on the general *437ground that upon the evidence the plaintiff was not entitled to recover, and on the specific grounds that the evidence did not warrant a finding that the negligence of the defendant was the sole or a contributing cause of the accident or that the plaintiff was free…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Turnquist v. HannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Hall v. Henry Thayer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Short v. DevineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Piper v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Industrial Commission v. PressleyArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Cozzo v. Atlantic Refining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Harold Hobart v. Michael P. O'brien, Harold M. Hobart v. John G. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
  5. McDonald v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API