Legal Opinion

Kramer v. Park-Et Restaurant, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 2007No. ED 87548PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Judge.

The claimant, Celeste Kramer, appeals from the Labor and Industrial Commission’s order denying her claim for unemployment-compensation benefits. The Division of Employment Security has filed a motion to dismiss the claimant’s appeal for failure to follow the requirements of Supreme Court Rule 84.04. The Division’s motion is well taken. Because the claimant has failed to substantially comply with the rules of appellate procedure, her brief preserves nothing for review and is inadequate to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, we grant the Division’s motion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Bishop v. Metro Restoration Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Weisenburger v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Thornton v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. ArcherMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Waller v. A.C. Cleaners Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Ward v. United Engineering Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. First State Bank of St. Charles v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. McGill v. Boeing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API