Legal Opinion

Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 2007No. WD 66679PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.

Cecil Brown appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision that he is not eligible for unemployment benefits because he voluntarily quit his job at Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc., without good cause attributable to his work or to his employer. Because of the woeful inadequacies of Brown’s brief, we dismiss his appeal.

Brown appears pro se. Although we are mindful of the difficulties that a party appearing pro se encounters in complying with the rules of procedure, we must require pro se appellants to comply with these rules. We must not grant a pro…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Shochet v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Zakibe v. Ahrens & McCarron, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Wilson v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. In Re Marriage of SpearsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Barekman v. City of RepublicMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Lueker v. Missouri Western State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Carden v. Missouri Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Kacie Nickel v. Stephens CollegeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Lau v. PughMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API