Legal Opinion

White v. Sweeney

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1955No. Civ. 16490PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment based on the sustaining without leave to amend of a demurrer to their first amended complaint.

The challenged pleading seeks a declaration that a certain promissory note is usurious, and also requests that the note be reformed to show the true amount borrowed. The pleading alleges that on March 22, 1950, plaintiffs borrowed $3,000 from defendant, executing and delivering to defendant their promissory note in the sum of $3,500, plus interest at 6 per cent on the unpaid balance, payable in 69.13 monthly installments of $60 each, commencing April 15,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Haines v. Commercial Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  3. French v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Tyrrell v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Grall v. San Diego Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pigeon Point Ranch, Inc. v. PerotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Almaden-Santa Clara Vineyards v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API