People v. Dunn
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Titone, J.
In recent years, law enforcement officers have increasingly turned to specially trained dogs to assist them in their efforts in the "war against drugs.” The present appeal raises the question of whether the use of these "canine cannabis connoisseurs” — as they have been termed 1 — to detect the presence of controlled substances in a person’s apartment is subject to the strictures of the Fourth Amendment of the Federal Constitution or article I, § 12 of the New York State Constitution. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that while the use of such dogs does…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- People v. KanNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. WeaverNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. WiegandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.