Legal Opinion
State v. Wiegand
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 2002No. C2-00-1137, C4-00-1138, C6-00-1139PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellants Rolan Wiegand, Loma Ques-ette Matthews, and Almond Baxter Long-ley were charged with fifth-degree possession of controlled substance in violation of Minn.Stat. § 152.025, subd. 2(1) (2000). They moved to suppress the evidence obtained as a result of a search of the vehicle they were in, which was conducted after a trained narcotics-detection dog alerted to the presence of narcotics under the hood of the vehicle. Wiegand also moved to suppress the evidence obtained from his person, which was recovered as a result of a pat-down search incident to…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Commonwealth v. FeyenordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.