Legal Opinion

People v. Scott

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1992PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

People v Scott

In Oliver v United States (466 US 170) the Supreme Court fully reaffirmed the doctrine articulated in Hester v United States (265 US 57): that in areas outside the curtilage, an owner of "open fields” enjoys no Fourth Amendment protection. This is so, the Oliver majority held, even for secluded lands and notwithstanding efforts of the owner to exclude the public by erecting fences or posting "No Trespassing” signs. In this appeal by defendant from a conviction for illegally growing marihuana on his land, we address the question expressly left…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Davenport v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United States v. Kevin C. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. People v. CahillNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. People v. BoraNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API