Legal Opinion

Vernon v. Supermarket Services Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 18, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

250 N.J. Super. 8 (1991)

593 A.2d 345

JAMES VERNON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

SUPERMARKET SERVICES CORP., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 10, 1991.

Decided June 18, 1991.

Before Judges MUIR, Jr., and BROCHIN.

Thomas M. Comer argued the cause for appellant (Rudnick, Waldman, Ford, Addonizio & Pappa, attorneys).

Elli C. Galed argued the cause for respondent (Harwood Lloyd, attorneys; Kathleen M. Berenbroick, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.

This appeal raises the issue of whether the workers' compensation bar…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. Lyon v. BarrettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Taylor v. Pfaudler Sybron Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Linden v. SolomachaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Diaz v. Johnson Matthey, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
  3. Kaczorowska v. National Envelope Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Holliday v. Personal Products Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API