Legal Opinion
Holliday v. Personal Products Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 9, 1996No. 93-5155PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is the renewed motion for summary judgment of defendant McNeil-PPC.
On October 2, 1992 plaintiff was injured while operating a Research Concept Maker machine manufactured by Personal Products Company in 1986. She brought this tort action against PPC’s corporate successor, McNeil-PPC, which was created when PPC merged with McNeil Consumer Products Company on January 1, 1989. After the merger PPC became an unincorporated division within McNeil-PPC. McNeil-PPC is a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.
At the time of the injury plaintiff was…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. John F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Braga v. Genlyte Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Kaczorowska v. National Envelope Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Holliday v. Personal Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997