Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Johnson Matthey, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 18, 1994No. Civ. 92-4717(JEI)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION GRANTING JMI’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART JM PLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IRENAS. District Judge.
Plaintiff, Jerry Diaz, worked in New Jersey for defendant, Johnson Matthey, Inc. (“JMI”), from 1981 to 1990. Defendant, Johnson Matthey, PLC (“JM PLC”), is JMI’s parent corporation. Plaintiff seeks damages for the long term health effects of on-the-job exposure to platinum salts. 1 Diaz claims that employees of both JMI and JM PLC advised him that the condition was temporary and that he would have no further health problems related to the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alexander v. Cigna Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- Diaz v. Johnson Matthey, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Pierce v. Montgomery County Opportunity Board, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- LITHUANIAN COMMERCE CORP. LTD. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.