A.I.M. International, Inc. v. Battenfeld Extrusions Systems, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OWENS, Chief Judge.
Defendants Battenfeld Extrusionstechnik, GmbH (“BEG”), Dr. Willi Dalhoff and Heinrich Schmiedeskamp urge this court to reconsider its June 2, 1987, order in which the court determined that “defendants’ motions to dismiss will be carried with the case and decided upon the trial of the case.” Specifically, defendants ask this court to grant their motion to dismiss on the basis of a lack of in personam jurisdiction. By so requesting, defendants have omitted from this motion grounds asserted previously, including insufficiency of process and insufficiency of service of…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Electronic Transaction Network v. KatzDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989
- Parry v. Ernst Home Center Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- Lyman Steel Corp. v. Ferrostaal Metals Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Southold Development Corp. v. Mittemyer (In Re Southold Development Corp.)District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. BSE Management, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.