Legal Opinion
Lyman Steel Corp. v. Ferrostaal Metals Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 15, 1990No. C88-2502PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BATTISTI, District Judge.
After the ships transporting the custom ordered steel plates delivered only some, but not all of the goods, upon arrival at port Cleveland, Plaintiffs Lyman Steel Company (“Lyman”) and Federal Insurance Company of New Jersey/ Chubb Insurance (“Chubb”) filed this diversity action on July 14, 1988 alleging causes of action for conversion and breach of contract and requesting compensatory and punitive damages. Defendants Ferrostaal Metals Corporation (“Ferrostaal U.S.A.”) Franz Kirchfeld GMBH & Company (“Kirchfeld”) and Fer-rostaal, Aktiengesellschaft…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- The General Contracting & Trading Co., LLC v. Interpole, Inc. v. Transamerican Steamship Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Neuralstem, Inc. v. StemCells, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Honda Motor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Southold Development Corp. v. Mittemyer (In Re Southold Development Corp.)District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Desert Palace, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.