Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Woods

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 30, 2006No. DR0209717; A124747PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Husband appeals from a general judgment of dissolution of marriage that was entered following court-annexed arbitration of the parties’ dispute pertaining to the division of marital property. Husband argues, principally, that the trial court erred in denying his request for a trial de novo after the filing of the arbitrator’s award. See ORS 36.425(2)(a). We agree and, particularly, conclude that husband did not by agreement waive his entitlement to obtain a trial de novo. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

The facts material to our disposition of this appeal are primarily procedural. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lesher v. StridCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Matter of Marriage of GrossmanOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Native Sun v. L & H DEVELOPMENT, INC.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Brodine v. Employment Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. DK Investment Co., LLC v. Inter-Pacific Development Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. UNION CEMETERY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE v. CoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Woods v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Clement v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Gemstone Builders, Inc. v. StutzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Cintas Corp. No. 3 v. Art Erickson Tire & Auto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API