Legal Opinion

Cintas Corp. No. 3 v. Art Erickson Tire & Auto, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 2016No. CV12040725; A154995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Defendant appeals, challenging the trial court’s grant of plaintiffs motion to strike the trial date and entry of judgment based on an arbitration award. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for a trial de novo because ORS 36.425 gives defendant a statutory right to a trial de novo and defendant did not waive that right. We agree because the record does not support the trial court’s finding that the parties agreed that arbitration would be binding arbitration as provided in the renewal agreement. Accordingly, we reverse and remand. Because we reverse on that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Koster Remodeling & Construction, Inc. v. JatakaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. In re the Marriage of WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fisk v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API