Legal Opinion

DK Investment Co., LLC v. Inter-Pacific Development Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 15, 2004No. 98C-19245; A113122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendants appeal from a jury verdict for plaintiff, arguing that the trial court erred in denying their motion for a directed verdict. “In reviewing a denial of a directed verdict, we will reverse only when there is a complete absence of evidence from which a jury could find the facts necessary to support the verdict.” Seidel v. Time Ins. Co., 157 Or App 556, 561, 970 P2d 255 (1998). In making that determination, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Ream v. Keen, 314 Or 370, 373 n 2, 838 P2d 1073 (1992). We affirm.

In July 1996, plaintiff purchased undeveloped real…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McMillan v. MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Seidel v. Time InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Ream v. KeenOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. McGann v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Sheldon v. SheldonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Bodunov v. KutsevCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Windmill Inns of America, Inc. v. CauvinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. In re the Marriage of McInnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API