Legal Opinion
Native Sun v. L & H DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 10, 1997No. 94-CV-0014-MS; CA A89980PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
Defendant L&H Development, Inc. (L&H) and intervenor Les Hilgers (Hilgers) appeal a judgment entered pursuant to an arbitration award. They contend that the trial court erroneously rejected their exceptions to the award on the ground that the arbitrator decided issues not submitted to him and that his decision was, in any event, grossly erroneous. We affirm.
Plaintiff Native Sun is a limited partnership engaged in land development. L&H is a general construction contractor. Hilgers is the principal owner of L&H. He also owned a 25-percent interest in Native Sun. His initial capital contribution…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brewer v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Sloan v. Journal Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Budget Rent-A-Car of Washington-Oregon, Inc. v. Todd Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Snow Mountain Pine, Ltd. v. Tecton Laminates Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Harold Schnitzer Properties v. Tradewell Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Marriage of WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Floor Solutions, LLC v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- Russell v. KerleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Seller v. Salem Womens Clinic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- 3000 Investment Corp. v. TeedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.