Legal Opinion

A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 6, 1965No. C.D. 2554PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of rubber footwear, assessed with duty under paragraph 1537 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Protocol of Terms of Accession by Japan to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53877, at 12% per centum ad valorem on the American selling price, T.D. 46158. It is claimed that the footwear is not of a kind specified in Presidential proclamation, T.D. 46158; that the proclamation is unconstitutional, illegal, null, and void; that the liquidation was premature and is illegal, null, and void; and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Excel Shipping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. United States v. Williams, Clarke Co.United States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Kelman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. United States v. Tiffany & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  5. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Korlis, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Standard Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  5. Atteberry v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API