Excel Shipping Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Donlon, Judge:
The question here at issue is whether dried fava 'beans, imported from the Azores at the port of New York during the period from May 1 to August 31, 1955, are entitled to the benefit of the reduced seasonal duty rate under paragraph 765 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the President’s proclamation effectuating the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 51802 and T.D. 52167.
There is no controversy as to the classification of these beans. They are beans, not specially provided for, other, dutiable under paragraph 765. The controversy before us has to do only with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. LeggCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- United States v. Cargo of SugarDistrict Court, D. California · 1874
- United States v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1871
- United States v. De VillamilCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- Kelman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Korlis, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Titanium Metals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Canion v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.