A. W. Fenton Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMarttn, Judge
It appears from the record that the key facts in this matter are as follows: Appellant, a customs broker, was engaged by Sharwell Bros. Shoe Co. (Sharwell) and Sharyama, Inc. (Sharyama), both of Cleveland, Ohio, to arrange for customs entry and clearance of several shipments of rubber boots. Appellant filed entries in its own name as nominal consignee, for the account of the ultimate consignees Shar-well and Sharyama. Statutory notices of appraisement announcing advances in the dutiable values were addressed to and received by appellant. An affidavit of the Secretary-Treasurer of appellant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pfister v. Northern Illinois Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Conboy v. First Nat. Bank of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Bowman v. LoperenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Roemer v. BernheimSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- United States v. Williams, Clarke Co.United States Customs Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.