Legal Opinion

Korlis, Ltd. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 20, 1966No. C.D. 2660PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

The merchandise of this protest consists of bicycles of Czechoslovakian manufacture and origin which were im*366ported at Mobile, Ala., under a warehouse entry. The merchandise was advanced in value upon appraisement, and the involved entry was liquidated upon the basis of the advanced values. The importer contends in its protest that liquidation of the subject entry is null and void because notice of appraisement was not given as required by law. It appears from the record that the collector reviewed the entry proceedings in the light of the protest claim and affirmed his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Excel Shipping Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Holtzman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Marvin Schnitzer Machinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Marvin Schnitzer Machinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API