Legal Opinion

Hartigan v. Hartigan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1919No. 21,202PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county for absolute divorce and .permanent alimony. From an order denying his motion for a modification of tbe order and decree, Jelley, J., defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff was granted a divorce February 10,1915, and- awarded permanent alimony of $75 per month. To defendant was given the care and *275custody of the two children. In August, 1915, plaintiff remarried. The alimony was paid to her to and including that month. Since then nothing has been paid, though demanded. On August 14, 1918, defendant served notice of motion for a modification of the decree terminating the payment of alimony as of August 31, 1915. The court granted the motion in part by cutting off the alimony from the time the motion herein was served. Defendant appeals.

The question…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cole v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Craig v. CraigIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Stillman v. StillmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Holton v. HoltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. Phy v. PhyOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Nelson v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Zieman v. ZiemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Lindbloom v. LindbloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API