Legal Opinion
Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 25, 2002No. AC 22115PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The pro se plaintiff, Henry B. Kudlacz, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the finding and dismissal of the plaintiffs claim by the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner). The plaintiff claims that there was no substantial reason to dismiss his claim. We affirm the decision of the board.
The commissioner found the following facts. The plaintiff had two employers. On May 29,1992, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant Lindberg Heat Treating Company (Lindberg) as a delivery driver. On June 3, 1992, he was employed by the…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Besade v. Interstate Security ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Doe v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Six v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Kolomiets v. Syncor International Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Pereira v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Lynch v. ScheiningerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Mele v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Kudlacz v. Lindberg Heat Treating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002