Doe v. City of Stamford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether, under the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., an employee has suffered a compensable injury for purposes of recovering expenses for medical testing and treatment at a time when he has been exposed to, but has not yet contracted, a potentially fatal contagious disease. The claimant, John Doe,1 an employee of the named defendant, the city of Stamford,2 appealed from the decision of the compensation review board (review board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner).…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Gartrell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Schiano v. Bliss Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.