Legal Opinion

Doe v. City of Stamford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 22, 1997No. SC 15631PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether, under the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., an employee has suffered a compensable injury for purposes of recovering expenses for medical testing and treatment at a time when he has been exposed to, but has not yet contracted, a potentially fatal contagious disease. The claimant, John Doe,1 an employee of the named defendant, the city of Stamford,2 appealed from the decision of the compensation review board (review board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner).…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Metro-North Commuter Railroad v. BuckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. State v. MetzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Gartrell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Schiano v. Bliss Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API